If you're working in PR right now, chances are you've been told that AI will either save your career or destroy it.

Honestly? Both predictions miss the point entirely.

After tracking how communications teams integrate AI into their workflows for the past two years, I've noticed something interesting: the teams that succeed aren't the ones with the fanciest tools or biggest budgets.

They're the teams that understand constraints.

The Context Everyone's Missing

For the past two years, we've been tracking how communications teams integrate AI into their workflows. What I've observed isn't particularly encouraging - while AI promises to revolutionise everything from media monitoring to content creation, the reality is messier.

Here's what I mean:

AI requests without constraints is equivalent to giving a junior account executive access to an entire media database and asking them to come back with the best journalists. Technically possible, but nowhere near the context required.

And a waste of everyone's time.

The 5 Common Mistakes (And How to Fix Them)

1. Treating AI Implementation Like a Technology Project

The Problem: Most agencies approach AI implementation like buying new software. They focus on tools, training, and budgets while ignoring the foundational work that makes AI effective.

The Reality: AI implementation is actually a process and operation redesign.

The Solution: Start with your existing workflows. Where are the bottlenecks? What takes too much manual effort? Then find AI solutions that specifically address those pain points.

2. Feeding Unstructured Data Into Sophisticated Systems

The Problem: Most agencies have:

• Media lists that haven't been properly updated in months

• Brand guidelines scattered across SharePoint

• Measurement frameworks that were barely functional before AI entered the picture

When you feed unstructured, inconsistent data into sophisticated systems, you can't expect coherent, on-brand results.

The Reality: It's like trying to bake a cake with mystery ingredients and wondering why it exploded in the oven.

The Solution: Clean your data first. Consolidate brand guidelines. Update your media databases. AI amplifies what you put in -- make sure what you're putting in is worth amplifying.

3. Ignoring Brand Consistency Guardrails

The Problem: I've seen AI tools produce content that's technically correct but sounds nothing like the client's voice, or worse, contradicts positioning established through months of strategic work.

The Reality: Without proper guardrails, AI has no chance to enhance your communications strategy. And if it looks like it's going to undermine it, teams won't trust it.

The Solution: Build constraints into your AI workflows. Create detailed brand voice guidelines, establish approval processes, and set up feedback loops that improve outputs over time.

4. Missing the Headcount Constraint Opportunity

The Problem: Most agencies think AI implementation starts with tool exploration and staff training on consumer-grade LLMs.

The Reality: Tool exploration isn't the starting line for adoption. The starting line is headcount constraints -- more specifically, constraints on people's time.

The Solution: Apply employee resource constraints with one hand and access to AI tooling with the other. When teams don't have unlimited time, they innovate faster.

5. Focusing on Advanced Tools Instead of Better Processes

The Problem: Teams assume they need more sophisticated AI to get better results.

The Reality: If your current data is siloed, inconsistent, or incomplete, AI will amplify those problems rather than solve them. If your team lacks clear guidelines for tone, messaging, or ethical considerations, AI outputs will reflect that ambiguity.

The Solution: The solution isn't more advanced AI - it's better constraints.

Why Headcount Constraints Drive Innovation

Here's what most agencies miss entirely: when you grow an agency, revenue growth goes hand in hand with headcount growth. However, technology and process innovation rarely occurs without constraints on hiring resources.

If teams have all the time they need to get everything done, the incentive to do things faster or more efficiently is removed.

At MVPR, our approach is simple:

We apply employee resource constraints with one hand and access to AI tooling and capabilities with the other.

The result? Our team consistently creates faster and more efficient ways of working.

Why this works:

Few PR agency CEOs have experience using hiring constraints as a forcing function for innovation and growth. And that's why I think few agencies will get AI implementation right -- and most will likely decline as a result.

The Bottom Line

The teams winning with AI aren't the ones with the biggest budgets or the fanciest tools.

They're the ones who understand that constraints drive innovation.

They're the ones who clean their data before expecting clean outputs.

They're the ones who build guardrails that enhance rather than restrict creativity.

And they're the ones who use resource constraints as a forcing function for better processes.